Window Replacement
Argon vs. Krypton Gas Fill: Does It Matter?
Understanding the insulating gases used in modern windows—how they work, performance differences, and which makes sense for your windows.
Argon vs. Krypton Gas Fill: Does It Matter?
Modern insulated windows are filled with inert gas rather than air. According to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, these gases improve insulation—but which one is better?
How Gas Fill Works
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, gas fills improve window performance by:
1. Lower conductivity: Heavier gas molecules transfer heat more slowly
2. Reduced convection: Denser gas has less convection current
3. Inert properties: Won't degrade coatings or react with materials
The Options
According to NFRC and LBNL:
| Gas | Thermal Conductivity | Cost | Optimal Gap Width |
|-----|---------------------|------|-------------------|
| Air | Baseline | Free | 1/2" |
| Argon | 34% lower | Low | 1/2" |
| Krypton | 63% lower | High | 3/8" or less |
Performance Impact
According to LBNL testing:
| Configuration | U-Factor |
|---------------|----------|
| Double Low-E, air fill | 0.32 |
| Double Low-E, argon fill | 0.27 |
| Double Low-E, krypton fill | 0.24 |
Argon improves U-factor by about 15% over air. Krypton improves another 10% over argon.
When Argon Makes Sense
According to DOE, argon is the standard choice because:
- **Excellent value:** Adds only $20-40 per window
- **Good performance:** Significant improvement over air
- **Widely available:** Standard in quality windows
- **Works with standard gap:** 1/2" spacing common in double-pane
When Krypton Makes Sense
According to LBNL, krypton is worth considering when:
- **Triple-pane windows:** Narrower gaps benefit from krypton
- **Thin-profile triple-pane:** Same thickness as double-pane
- **Maximum efficiency required:** Passive house or similar standards
- **Budget allows:** Adds $75-150 per window
Does Gas Leak Out?
According to FGIA research, quality IGUs lose about 1% of gas per year. According to DOE, windows retain effectiveness even with partial gas loss—they never become worse than air-filled.
After 20 years, a window initially filled with 90% argon might have 70% argon—still providing meaningful benefit.
The Bottom Line
For most residential applications, argon is the clear choice—excellent performance at minimal cost. Krypton makes sense for triple-pane or when maximum performance justifies the premium.
*For complete glass options, see: [Single, Double, and Triple-Pane Windows](/guides/single-double-triple-pane-windows)*
Sources & References
Part of our comprehensive guide:
Single, Double or Triple Pane? Making the Right Choice →Need Help With Your Project?
Connect with certified installers in Boise and the Treasure Valley for expert assistance.
Find Local Installers